Neighbors sue over Starlight Drive gate to Encinitas Community Park

Neighbors sue over Starlight Drive gate to Encinitas Community Park

A group of Cardiff neighbors has sued to stop Encinitas from creating an access point to the Encinitas Community Park and a walking path along a small, privately maintained road on the park’s southern edge.

The neighbors, who live along Starlight Drive, urged the city in October to drop the proposal to construct a gate in the park’s southern wall and a pathway along their street, which the council said would provide children a safe and direct link between Ada Harris and Cardiff elementary schools through the park that bypassed any major streets.

The City Council voted 4-1 Oct. 12 to approve the proposal, which engineering officials said would cost $66,000 to take out the section of the 6-foot-tall concrete wall, install the gate and create a 6-foot-wide decomposed granite walking path along the east side of Starlight to Warwick Avenue.

The neighbors filed their 15-page lawsuit on Jan. 8.

Neighbors have contended the city promised them when the park opened that they would never create an access point to the park from their neighborhood. City staff said they were unable to find record of the agreement, but residents pushed back that the fact there was no access was proof of the verbal arrangement.

The City Council as part of the October vote instructed staff to sit down with the neighbors before moving ahead with the project. Neighbors said they have tried to contact staff and the City Attorney’s office without success, forcing them to file the lawsuit.

“The city and the City Attorney’s office has repeatedly blown us off,” said Greg Hagen, an attorney who lives on Starlight Drive and is one of the plaintiffs in the suit. “They originally said there would be no gate on this side of the park. The honest thing and the consistent thing would have been to not put a gate here because it would be unfair to the people with whom you made the promise.

“Before they force people to file suit, they should sit down and have a discussion about this and they should do that before start passing resolutions and start taking property from people,” Hagen said. “I think they are acting like the big bully down the block.”

The suit revolves around the city’s rights to take control of the private roadway, which the council invoked through what is known as an irrevocable offer of dedication.

Neighbors contend that the original intent of the city’s dedication offer was to take control of the entire street to transform Starlight into a publicly maintained road from Warwick Drive to Santa Fe Drive.

The City Council voted to invoke it for only the section of the road where the path would be, which neighbors said was counter to purpose of offer of dedication.

“The city is saying, ‘We can take that public highway and turn it into a less impactful use … but leaves us to shoulder the burden of drainage, and the potential of liability if someone falls off the path onto the road,’ ” Hagen said. “What we are saying is if you do take it, you must take it as a public highway.”

But the lawsuit also charges that the city violated state environmental quality laws when they said the project was exempt from those laws because it didn’t take the full impact of pedestrian and vehicle traffic would be on the seldom-used streets.

The suit also alleges that the city through its actions has devalued the properties of two of the neighbors, the Schaar and the Drury families.

The City Council discussed real property negotiations regarding Starlight Drive at the Jan. 11 City Council meeting and directed staff to speak with neighbors.

City officials would not provide further comment, citing the pending litigation.

 

 

4 Comments
  1. Davo619 11 months ago

    Man these wealthy old people, only concerned about themselves. I live in Cardiff and support this. How can people be so selfish?

    • John Eldon 11 months ago

      If we truly believe in promoting walking and bicycling, as I do, then we need to support connections such as this.

  2. Greg Hagen 11 months ago

    As the individual quoted in this article, I would add the following.

    The City is basing its assertion that it has a right to do this on something called IOD’s or Irrevocable Offers of Dedication, which were originally given to the County to allow for possible future use as a “public highway” (the actual IOD terminology) from Warwick to Santa Fe. That use no longer exists, so it would be my view that the IOD’s cannot be implemented. One an look up the Complaint online, and it will shed light on these facts.

    As to the idea that it’s just “wealth old people” being selfish, that’s not just factually inaccurate but inapposite, and it seems that the focus should be on the promises that the City has made to these residents and the multiple existing entrances and exits to the park, including one less than a minute away by bike and only a few minutes walk.

    There were multiple persuasive arguments for not having an entrance point on the South side of the park. None has changed in the intervening decade, particularly the heavy levels of traffic on weekends through small streets when there are events at the park.

  3. PATRICK OCONNOR 11 months ago

    This issue should be held over for public comment and hearing. Has an impact study been made for parking impacts , on adjacent streets ? As MR. Hagen has shown an existing gate exists in this wall close by that would not impede .public access..

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

a
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?