The Coast News Group
News Old - DO NOT USE - The Coast News Rancho Santa Fe

Local doctor shares his views on dangers from electromagnetic field radiation

Dr. Dan Harper, M.D., was among the first to arrive at the Encinitas City Council meeting the evening of July 21. Carrying a 12-inch stack of medical journal articles about the health risks of electromagnetic field, or EMF, radiation, he was there to speak on behalf of his patient, Michael Schwaebe.
Schwaebe was appealing the placement of WiMAX towers on the site of the former Cabo Grill at Coast Highway 101 and La Costa Avenue. WiMAX is often referred to as “a cell tower on steroids.”
Harper directed his initial remarks to the Sprint Clearwire representatives in attendance when he quoted author Upton Sinclair: “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon him not understanding.”
Harper said he was frustrated, but not surprised, that he was unable to complete his presentation.
It would have been illegal.

Dr. Dan’s Advice

Dr. Dan Harper offers a few tips on how to protect yourself from EMFs:

  1. Purchase a Trifield Meter to measure EMF radiation in your home. The price is about $125 online.
  2. In homes, make sure the grounding is done correctly at the junction box of the circuit breaker and of the switch box inside that grounds to the hot water. EMF-sensitive patients have to have a 3-foot section of nonmetallic pipe between their water meter and the house, or all the grounded negative energy comes from neighboring homes into their house and onto them when they shower or do dishes.
  3. Keep children more than 4 to 5 feet from the front of the TV and away from any alternating current devices such as air filters, computers and stereos.  
  4. Use a large computer monitor, with a corded mouse and key pad that can be set 3 to 4 feet away from the monitor and tower to prevent the strong EMFs from entering your body. Stay away from laptops.
  5. Turn off electrical equipment at the surge protector when not in use. Turn off routers on wi-fi and computers so EMF radiation is not shot through the house and neighborhood.
  6. Don’t use a cordless phone. Get a speaker phone or land line.
  7. Limit cell phone texting and talking, turning off the phone when not in use. If it is kept turned on, it is broadcasting microwaves into the tissues of the person carrying it and those around them. Second-hand radiation is more dangerous than second-hand cigarette smoke in my opinion. The further one gets from the cell tower, the stronger the cell phone blasts into the tissues trying to reach the tower. The closer one gets to the tower, the more the tower blasts the person there, whether they have a phone on or not.
  8. Bluetooth phones triple the amount of negative energy entering your body.
  9. Finally, don’t live near a cell tower unless you have your life insurance policy and your medical insurance covers cancer, autoimmunity, dementia (including Alzheimer’s and presenile dementia), heart disease, diabetes, and a large number of so called chronic diseases that have been shown to increase in the presence of harmful EMFs at low doses.

The wireless industry is protected by Article 704 of the Telecommunications Act signed by President Clinton in 1996 which prohibits arguments of potential health risks from communications towers to be made at public hearings, even if they are legitimate.
Consequently, Schwaebe and his fellow presenters were forced to fall back on a secondary argument, declining property values as a result of placement of the WiMAX towers.
Had Dr. Harper been able to complete his speech, following are points he would have made.
Today, there is an indisputable parallel between the wireless and the tobacco industry, which was not required to post warning labels on cigarette packaging and in advertising until 1965 — after generations of families suffered from respiratory illnesses, cancers and even death due to smoking.
“It took 50 years to get warning labels and they are still selling the product,” Harper wrote in his notes.
In addition, he would have cited studies since the 1970s that show an increase in many cancers of those living within 300 meters of power lines. “Despite being a class 1B carcinogen, they are still building schools and houses on cheap land under power lines,” his notes read.
He would have made the argument that if we post the addresses of sexual predators, why then can’t the location of concealed or stealth cell tower antennaes also be posted.
Harper is a proponent of the need to develop safe neighborhoods for chemically sensitive and EMF-sensitive individuals such Michael Schwaebe by burying powerlines, having no wi-fi in a minimum of a half-mile radius, and no cell towers or pesticides or herbicides sprays in the area.
Finally, Harper would have made an argument that the EMF radiation controversy should actually be a state’s rights issue.
“Even though the FCC has said to ignore the potential health risks to humans and have a 150-day limit on the request to locate their wireless units, you are the wall of protection,” he wrote in his comments to City Council. “This is a federation of states with the states regulating the insurance, medical, dental and mortuary industries. The sheriff of this county has more rights of executive power than the FBI since the sheriff is elected and accountable to the voters.”
So, is he a whack job? Who is Dr. Dan Harper?
He graduated magna cum laud from Baylor College of Medicine, which today ranks No. 13 in research behind Stanford and before UCLA according to
He is board certified in holistic medicine and family medicine; and board eligible in emergency medicine with more than 35,000 hours of ER experience.
Before moving to San Diego five years ago he was licensed in Oregon, Wyoming, Montana and Texas. Currently he’s licensed in California and Arizona.
It was changes he noticed in his own system and in his patients in his Solana Beach medical practice that prompted him to investigate environmental factors that impact health here on the coast.
“I did not have problems in Montana since no cell phone towers were there at the time,” he said. “I got here and things were blazin’ hot and people were ill due to the EMFs. There was catatonic schizophrenia, depression, autism, arrhythmias of heart, seizures — all related to EMF exposure. I hit (National Institutes of Health research website) and the Internet to find out why.”
He also took several courses on EMFs offered through the American Academy of Environmental Medicine and studied under Dr. William J. Rea, who is considered one of the fathers of environmental medicine.
Harper learned that San Diego is the second-highest radiated city in the nation, behind Washington, D.C.
“There is 10 million times the background radiation in San Diego compared to 1970,” he said. “It is caused by technology such as cell towers and high-powered transformer lines; military telecommunications; Doppler radar and sonograms shot into earthquake faults. It is also generated by wi-fi communications for computers and games, SDG&E smart meters and transformers on poles and on the ground of local neighborhoods (camouflaged) as green boxes.”
Harper warns that EMF radiation even interferes with meditation at the Self Realization Fellowship.
Ultimately, he says this is leading to a generation of older Americans with pre-senile dementia being cared for by a younger generation with a disproportionate amount of brain cancer.
Beyond our own world, he warns that extremely low frequency, or ELF, radiation used to communicate with submarines is impacting ocean life.
“They interfere with the vestibular apparatus of the brains of the whales,” Harper said. “It messes up their navigation and seems to impair cognition.”
Frustrated, Dr. Harper walked out of the council meeting on July 21 after a woman representing the wireless industry said she had no closing remarks except to say that the city of Encinitas had no legal leg to stand on.
“My heart sank as I saw big business once again put the FCC knife to the throats of the City Council and tell them they would have to sit and watch as they raped and ravaged the community and there was nothing they could do,” he said. “Every citizen is being blasted at a cellular level by this radiation. It may take two or three decades to manifest the cancer or dementia, but it is adversely affecting us all.”
He said that 3 percent of the population is severely and rapidly affected with symptoms such as headaches, confusion, tachycardia, anxiety, skin burning and hives.
“Sixteen percent will only feel the fatigue, insomnia, ‘brain farts’ and memory issues, and the other 81 percent will look at that 19 percent and recommend a good psychiatrist until 30 or 40 years down the road (medical) articles will begin to report that cell phones and wi-fi are more dangerous than cigarettes, asbestos and leaded gasoline put together,” he said.
After members of the Encinitas City Council explained that they had no choice but to deny the appeal, for fear of losing money in legal bills in a futile battle with the federal government, Deputy Mayor Maggie Houlihan called on citizens to write their congressmen and senators to demand that Article 704 be repealed.
The Coast News contacted Rep. Brian Bilbray and his opponent Francine Busby to ask if they would lead such a movement to repeal Article 704. To date, only Bilbray’s office had responded.
Following is the statement from Bilbray’s office: “Congressman Bilbray holds health and safety standards in the highest regard. The standards used in the 1996 Telecom Act to support Article 704 were, at the time, the most stringent health standards available in the United States. A review of these standards has been scheduled by the Federal Communications Commission and Congressman Bilbray will make a determination on further action upon completion of the review.”


John Tainio August 12, 2010 at 4:33 pm

There are devices which change the spin on emf from dibilitating to strengthening such as the life field polarizer.

Christine Hoch August 12, 2010 at 7:17 pm

I commend Dr. Harper for educating others about the reported health effects of radiofrequency radiation. I agree with his advice on how to protect yourself from electromagnetic radiation. There is research to support Dr. Harper’s views at

borderraven August 12, 2010 at 11:43 pm

What are the consequences of violating Article 704 of the Telecommunications Act signed by President Clinton in 1996 which prohibits arguments of potential health risks from communications towers to be made at public hearings, even if they are legitimate?

Sharon Noble August 13, 2010 at 9:21 am

President Obama’s Panel on Environmental Causes of Cancer needs to receive the information that people like Dr. Harper have discovered. It is criminal that the powerful lobby groups have taken control of our lives, all for profit. The only recourse is to demand that the Telecom Act be revised. Honorable people like Dr. Harper must speak up and demand to be heard whenever and wherever possible. If Americans realized that the US’s standards for radiation are among the worst in the world, maybe more would be concerned.

Gerry Duffett August 15, 2010 at 10:01 am

Documents / GerryLeaks / Toronto / Radio Frequency Weapons / Torture / EIR


"Radio Waves used as Weapons"

Posted by :

Gerry Duffett

3358-A McCowan Rd
Scarborough Ontario
Canada M1V 5P5,,

DavidNL August 16, 2010 at 1:46 pm

My story is translated from Dutch. It is of the utmost importance. You could be affected too.
I have a PhD in electrical engineering. I worked at a multinational electronics company in The Netherlands on the design of integrated circuits (chips) for the newest generation of mobile phones (LTE).
I worked with a view on transmission tower and right next to a Wi-Fi accespoint. Three years ago.
I owned a smartphone, Wii, everything. From 1995 onwards I had a mobile phone, after that one of the first UMTS phones.
Problems first started with a headache when I sat beside the WiFi router. Afterwards fatigue, nausea, and concentration problems.
On one location, I would feel those after being there for some hours, and on another location I would not.
It is important to note that I had already worked there for months without feeling anything. So there seems to be some kind of ‘incubation time’.
Months later, it got worse and I got the same complaints also from working for on my laptop, and even at ordinary computer monitors. I still have this now after several years.
You can imagine that it took me months before I even dared to believe it.
Then I found out this is called electrosensitivity.
The ‘scientific’ argument is often used against us. Obviously I fully support the scientific methods. Except for the ‘provocation studies’, which are very damaging to us.
Many people are believers in ‘this cannot be wrong’. Love of the technology is making them blind. I have been there and can understand this. Let go of it for a while.
Let me show you some scientific evidence from ‘the other side’. A special issue of Elsevier Pathophysiology, a respected scientific journal, outlining health effects like DNA damage, blood-brain barrier effects etc.:
I am writing this on my computer although I can only work on it for a few hours until the monitor starts giving me a sharp headache. Just a few years ago, I could work all day and night at the computer without problems. In fact, I happily worked with computers all my life (starting with the Commodore 64 when I was 8 years old). Not anymore now.
The condition depends on physical condition (sports and relaxing helpt) and the sensitivity varies from day to day. I got much improvement from avoiding Wi-Fi, cordless home phone base stations, and transmission towers (but that’s almost impossible).
After years of changing my habits, concentration is much improved. Today I feel better (time scale of reaction is slowed) but the impact is still there (frequently light headache), and fatigue. The vulnerability remains. It comes back when I spend days in close vicinty of a Wi-Fi acces point, for example.
When I switch to another type of monitor (I must have tried 10 by now) first all goes well and then, after some months, I start getting a headache from it.
The immune system seems to be involved. It’s like an allergy.
We are NOT crazy. These are 100% physiological and not psychological problems.
Electrosensitives are not wrongly attributing their health problems to wireless and electronic equipment. The electromagnetic fields from the equipment are causing the health problems.
Well, I am praying for the ‘technology lovers’ that they don’t get it themselves.
Now I have to stop because the monitor is giving me a headache.
For the curious: google “Brian Stein Youtube”

DavidNL August 16, 2010 at 1:51 pm

Where I wrote ‘transmission tower’ it should read ‘cell tower’. Brian Stein electrosensitive CEO is at:

Wi Fi Search August 16, 2010 at 4:00 pm

KELLY School Has a lower height WI Fi Antenna located in the middle of the school!!!
Not to mention the high powered electric lines across from the school!
Folks even Chicago Elementary School is suing because the children at their school who hosted a wifi antennas have become ill with leukemia-

holly Manion August 17, 2010 at 7:57 am

Are you sure you have your facts right? I believe the 1996 Telecommunications Act refers to placement of cell phone towers not Internet antennas. Check it out.

M. Yount August 21, 2010 at 10:33 am

This article is extremely one-sided. While Dr. Harper may believe this all to be true, I don’t see a lot of hard evidence presented in this article, or a voice from an opposing side. This reads as one man’s opinion and the paper is giving him a soap box. C’mon Coast News, you can do better. This feels a lot like fear-mongering because of someone’s pet issue. August 24, 2010 at 2:36 pm

The TCA act section 704 reads this and there are Legal grounds to stand on.
The Section states no city or state shall deny a permit based on environmental or health issues of RF, to the EXTENT the RF is IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FCC STANDARDS.
Basic Rule number one 1.) Is the bottom of the antennas 33 feet from ground level.
if the answer is NO – then the city can hire at the expense to the applicant to GAIN AN RF ENGINEER 3rd party to make sure they are in compliance !!!!
There are MIN. Standards per FEDERAL LAW – CITIZENS NEED TO REINFORCE THIS TO OUR City Elected Officials, The wireless industry has Ran Far too long like a wild college party boy out of control ruining our quality of life NOT FOLLOWING SIMPLE RULES!

AGomez August 30, 2010 at 10:18 am

Section 704(b)(iv) of the Telecom Act states:
The Act provides:

“No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission’s regulations concerning such emissions.”

In Sprint Spectrum v. Township of Warren Planning Board, 737 A. 2d 715 (N.J. Superior Ct. App. Div. 1999), the court ruled:

“The actual preemptive language of the Act rests upon a demonstration by the applicant of compliance with RF emissions as established in the applicable federal regulations. That language, by its own terms, requires compliance with federally-established RF emissions levels as a prerequisite to preemption.

The FCC has published “A Local Government Official’s Guide to Transmitting Antenna RF Emission Safety: Rules, Procedures, and Practical Guidance,” (Practical Guidance) June 2, 2000. In the introduction of this document, the FCC stated that the “voluntary guide [was] to assist state and local governments in devising efficient procedures for ensuring that the antenna facilities located in their communities comply with the FCC’s limits for human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields.” In other words, the FCC has acknowledged that local governments have the authority to devise procedures to confirm that a facility complies with FCC RF standards.

Today, our nation’s workers are routinely exposed to RF radiation in violation of the FCC human exposure limits because wireless antennas are everywhere – on rooftops, sides of buildings, utility poles, hidden inside buildings. As a result, workers are routinely compelled to work close to and in front of RF transmitting antennas.

A comprehensice RF safety program is needed to protect all workers and the public. Until then, no wireless service provider can demonstrate 24/7 compliance with RF standards, a prerequisite to federal preemption under the Telecom Act.

Lloyd Burrell September 3, 2010 at 2:14 am

Dr Harper is so right. I went from being perfectly healthy 8 years ago to one day being very electrosensitive because of my rather excessive cell phone use. I can’t use a cell phone anymore. At the time this seemed something of a curse but I now see this more of a blessing. Because of this sensitivity I have been able to discover alternative medicines, and homeopathy in particular.
As Dr Harper shows we are all subject to much more pollution in our every day lives than we realize, because much of it is invisible. There is a growing public awareness of the dangers of cell phones but many people remain ignorant of the dangers of electromagnetic radiation in our own homes even from sources as hamless as a burglar alarm see

Comments are closed.