Assemblywoman Marie Waldron said that Republicans will “continue to hold the project accountable and ensure that it meets its transparency standards.” Courtesy photo
Cities Community Community Community Escondido Escondido Featured News Region San Marcos

GOP minority leader Marie Waldron reacts to State of the State

ESCONDIDO — Republican Assemblywoman Marie Waldron responded to Gov. Gavin Newsom’s first State of the State Speech on Feb. 12 in Sacramento, saying she was in agreement with several of the issues Newsom discussed.

Waldron, minority party leader,  represents California State Assembly 75th District, which includes San Marcos and Escondido. 

Waldron also noted that Assembly Republicans will keep a close eye on Newsom as the promises in his speech materialize into substantive legislative and regulatory proposals. 

 “California has a lot going for it and we heard that in the governor’s speech,” Waldron said. “So, there was a lot to like in the speech. We believe in cutting the red tape that holds up housing, an increase in MediCal reimbursement rates, something we’ve been advocating for for a long time. And his speech also gave details about ramping up the fight against homelessness and mental illness, all big issues.”

Waldron, a former Escondido City Councilwoman who still maintains an office in the city, also praised Newsom’s announcement during the speech to nix the high-speed railway proposal which would have connected San Francisco and Los Angeles. Instead, Newsom will proceed with a shorter route running from Bakersfield to Merced.

“Well, the reality check has come in because high-speed rail has been a boondoggle for a long time,” Waldron said. “You know, he’s looking at a segment that they can run efficiently as an economic development route. However, we want to see how it pencils out because the original project was based around the ridership that would’ve come out of San Francisco, the Bay Area and possibly L.A. So, I don’t know how it will pencil out without those ridership levels.” 

Waldron said that Republicans will “continue to hold the project accountable and ensure that it meets its transparency standards,” as well. 

Climate change, too, made an appearance in Newsom’s speech, mostly via the lens of ongoing bankruptcy negotiations between the state and the utility company PG&E.

Waldron said, depending on the details of legislative and regulatory proposals, Republican legislators can potentially get behind some of Newsom’s climate-related proposals. 

“I think certainly that Republicans can get behind ideas that cause may cause new innovation, but not at the expense of people and jobs. We only look for that balance,” Waldron said. “You know, we’re all for healthy forests and quality, clean air and we look forward to continuing working with him. Of course … we would need to see the details … and hope to be at the table, as well.”

Beyond the State of the State, Waldron also said she has observed the new coalition seated on the Escondido City Council with interest, though the day-to-day grind of policymaking in Sacramento has kept her from following along closely.

She says she will have many public policy issues on her plate at the State Capitol in the coming weeks and months which impact 75th District constituents.

“We’re working on a lot of issues, including the health care issue (which) is big. Increasing the MediCal reimbursement which the governor touched on are big issues that we’ve been advocating on for long time to increase,” Waldron said. “Republicans are also for the idea of loan forgiveness for physicians, as well as nurses, if they go to work in a rural area. That will help us get more physicians into areas currently underserved.”

Related posts

Carlsbad man on forefront of video games

Steve Puterski

Delays causing concern over sand dredging efforts

Promise Yee

Encinitas seeks fix for ‘mini-dorms’

Promise Yee

WIT’s annual event triggers reflection

Rancho Santa Fe school offers back-to-school nights

admin

City partners with Boys & Girls Clubs to offer more programs

Bianca Kaplanek

1 comment

taxpayerconcerns February 19, 2019 at 8:30 pm

To Assemblywoman Marie Waldron
Someone should be watching the store in the County offices for the HCD mandated housing allocations. HCD mandates a total number of housing units, the RHNA, that must be up-zoned and built by the County or a developer. For the 5th cycle RHNA housing unit numbers, San Diego County Supervisors were told they had to increase the number of housing units to 22,412. Orange County, on the hand, for the 5th cycle RHNA will only have to build 5,272 housing units. Didn’t anyone in San Diego County government question the large discrepancy in housing units between San Diego and Orange County? While the cities in San Diego struggle to pay and up-zone properties to meet the HCD mandated housing units many of the cities in the SCAG regional agency have less required housing.
HCD and local planning departments are manipulating the numbers that create an impossible situation of one step forward and two steps back in trying to meet these bogus housing unit numbers.
As an example:
A housing unit refers to one apartment in a building or one house.
Newport Beach was given only 5 total housing units to build. That number includes 1 very low and 1 low income unit.
The required 5th cycle RHNA low income housing units for some other cities:
Beverly Hills – 2 housing units
El Segundo – 29 housing units
Malibu – 2 housing units
Manhattan Beach – 16 housing units
Newport Beach – 2 housing units
Palos Verdes Estates – 7 housing units
Rancho Palos Verdes – 13 housing units
Sierra Madre – 23 housing units
Costa Mesa – 2 housing units
Laguna Beach – 2 housing units
Dana Point – 129 housing units
Huntington Beach – 533 housing units
Hermosa Beach – 2 housing units
The mandated housing numbers are unjust and unfair for residents in the San Diego region.
Our state representatives should investigate why HCD is requiring the cities in San Diego County to build more than their “fair share” of housing. Why aren’t the cities in SANDAG mandated only 2 housing units.

Reply

Leave a Comment