Dr. Jerry Meral, deputy secretary of the California Natural Resources Agency, addressed North County city leaders about the problems facing the Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay Delta and the proposed Bay Delta Conservation Plan at a panel discussion on Aug. 15. “If it all disappeared tomorrow, I don’t know what we’d do to replace it,” he said of the Bay Delta. Photo by Rachel Stine
Dr. Jerry Meral, deputy secretary of the California Natural Resources Agency, addressed North County city leaders about the problems facing the Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay Delta and the proposed Bay Delta Conservation Plan at a panel discussion on Aug. 15. “If it all disappeared tomorrow, I don’t know what we’d do to replace it,” he said of the Bay Delta. Photo by Rachel Stine

County water supply at stake as Water Authority reviews plans to fix Bay Delta

REGION — The San Diego County Water Authority is working on evaluating the latest plan aiming to fix the ailing Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay Delta, a major source of water for San Diego County and the entire state of California. 

Located east of San Francisco Bay, the Sacramento-San Joaquin Bay Delta provides water for 25 million Californians throughout the state.

Though San Diego County also obtains water from local sources and the Colorado River, the Bay-Delta remains a critical source of water. Over the past five years, the Bay-Delta provided 20 percent of San Diego County’s water supply, according to the San Diego County Water Authority.

“It’s kind of the hub of all water supply for the whole state,” explained Richard Atwater, executive director of the Southern California Water Committee.

For years the Bay-Delta has been afflicted by environmental, structural and water supply problems, which among other impacts has resulted in a decline of its water supply reliability.

Atwater said that the Delta and its water delivery infrastructure are susceptible to a myriad of destructive events including a massive earthquake.

He said that if the water supply from the Bay Delta was cut off for any reason, it would have a “catastrophic effect” on the state’s economy.

“We can’t afford to do nothing,” he said.

“The (San Diego County) Water Authority believes that something needs to be done to preserve the water supply and the ecosystem in the Bay Delta,” said Dennis Cushman, assistant general manager of the San Diego County Water Authority.

In 2009, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act, which was designed to reform water policies and launch plans to restore the Bay Delta.

Consequently, water agencies, environmental and conservation organizations, state and federal agencies, and other groups have collaborated to develop the Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP).

The latest BDCP administrative draft proposes a series of alternatives that center around a 50-year permit to build a new conveyance system in the north Bay Delta, construct three new intakes, insert two tunnels that would transfer water to the existing plants in the south Bay Delta, and implement conservation measures to protect the Bay Delta’s endangered species.

The entire 50-year implementation of the plan would cost about $24.5 billion to be paid for by water consumers throughout the state.

The official draft of the BDCP and its environmental review are expected to be released in October this year so that state and federal authorities, as well as local agencies can submit formal comments on the plan.

State officials intend on making a decision on the plan in spring 2014.

A panel of experts discussed the proposed BDCP at length on Aug. 15 at the Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce in the hopes of better informing local officials about the issues concerning the Bay Delta.

Staff and city council members from cities throughout North County, including Carlsbad’s Councilmember Lorraine Wood, attended the discussion.

While the panelists, which included Atwater and Cushman, agreed that the state of the Bay Delta is in decline and needs to be improved in order to secure southern California’s water supply, not everyone was ready to endorse the BDCP.

Cushman said that through water conservation programs and expanding local water sources, San Diego County has reduced its reliance on water supply from the Bay Delta.

The San Diego County Water Authority reduced its water purchase from the Metropolitan water District of Southern California, which sources its water from the Bay Delta, by 66 percent over the past two decades.

Still, the Bay Delta will continue to supply a significant amount of the County’s imported water.

As a result, the San Diego County Water Authority is currently analyzing the range of alternatives proposed for fixing the Bay Delta to establish which plan is the most practical and affordable assurance of reliable water supply, said Cushman.

He said that the Water Authority still has concerns about the BDCP’s proposal.

“Nobody has quantified what the financial impact will be and nobody has quantified what the water supply reliability will be,” he said.

The San Diego Water Authority is still collecting information about the BDCP and other plans as it is available before officially endorsing a specific alternative.

The San Diego Water Authority Board of Directors intends on endorsing an alternative and submitting a formal comment letter on the BDCP in November, according to a July 25 press release.

Related posts

Community helps garden grow

Jared Whitlock

Showers to be shut off at state beaches

Ellen Wright

Verdi crossing gets preliminary design, but construction funding remains uncertain

Carey Blakely

Surf’s up: Advisory issued for San Diego County coast

Coast News wire services

Block Party Cardiff style

Pat Cubel

Bringing Brazilian joy to coffee one cup at a time

Carey Blakely


Rogene Reynolds August 23, 2013 at 1:10 am

San Diego County water ratepayers do not have to foot the bill for the BDCP tunnel project. There is a viable alternative, and it is “through Delta”. For one-fifth the price of the BDCP tunnels, all Delta levees could be improved to protect the flow of export water, while protecting Delta cities and infrastructure. “Habitat” can be developed on the slopes of these larger levees. Last, but not least, a state of the art set of fish screens can solve the problem of entrainment.
California taxpayers need to know the BDCP “mitigation” as planned includes the condemnation (through eminent domain) of over 100,000 acres of prime Delta farmland – to be converted to “upland” or “tidal” habitat. Land that has been productively farmed for over 140 years will be destroyed at taxpayers’ expense ($ 7 Billion) to permit a plan for tunnels that are unnecessary.
With the exception of desert land that should not be farmed (it doesn’t drain), California can thrive and use its resources, not on pipe dreams, but on local water development projects.
Isolated conveyance to move Delta water is an old idea – it is time for 21st century solutions to California’s water needs.
Thanks for the opportunity to comment. Rogene Reynolds, South Delta.

Linda Sills August 24, 2013 at 9:09 pm

I have never heard such drivel in all my life. There are NO endangered species anywhere near this region. YOU are being LIED to. For the love of God, wake up. This is all part of Agenda 21. The re-wilding of the entire planet. This notion that humans are the problem is GARBAGE! Do you people hear yourselves. Man, are you being played for the biggest suckers ever. There is zero common sense left in the world, if you want to stop the farming. Where do you think food is going to come from? Just keep letting these damned global elites depopulate you, and then maybe the light will dawn on you. But, I will not hold my breath.

Comments are closed.