Popular lifeguard chief fired

Popular lifeguard chief fired
Pat Vergne good-naturedly takes part in the 2011 groundbreaking for the 17th Street beach safety center. The city’s community services director and chief lifeguard was fired Aug. 23. Photos by Bianca Kaplanek

DEL MAR — After a months-long investigation into allegations of workplace misconduct and misuse of public funds, the City of Del Mar’s popular community services director and chief lifeguard Pat Vergne, was fired Aug. 23.

Pat Vergne

“I was surprised the way it came out,” Vergne, a 35-year Del Mar employee, said. “There’s always two sides to a story.”

According to a press release issued less than 20 minutes after Vergne said he met with city officials and received the news, the investigation concluded that between 2015 and 2017, Community Services Department staff cost the city nearly $200,000.

Vergne and his employee Liza Rogers are accused of waiving or discounting permit fees totaling more than $150,000. submitting $43,000 worth of false claims for pay and overtime. hiring and paying a part-time city employee an extra $23,000 as an outside contractor to do work he was already doing as part of his regular job. and making more than $4,500 in personal purchases using a City of Del Mar credit card.

Vergne doesn’t deny many of the allegations, saying that if his actions were questionable someone would have confronted him.

“When we built the Powerhouse it was … designed to bring the community together, and as it grew over the years we started to rent it out a little bit more,” Vergne said. “I had been given flexibility in the rental rates.

“It was simply that was my task,” he added. “Or at least I thought that was my task, to bring the beach community, the parks, everyone together. And when we needed something – fixing the interior – then the nonprofits would give money to the city so it was a win-win situation for everyone.

“A couple of applications (for permits) were from ex-lifeguards,” Vergne said. “I didn’t see anything wrong with letting the building be used by an ex-employee or a current employee. … Typically if it was a memorial service then we would waive the fees. That wasn’t uncommon.

“I managed that facility for 17 years and not at any one time did the city manager approach me with concerns or I would immediately have addressed the concerns and changed,” Vergne said. “It’s not like the books were being hidden. They had access to everything.”

“All I can do is accept that as his point of view,” City Manager Scott Huth said. “But if he put the money in his pocket would you have a different point of view?”

Huth said he and his administrative staff didn’t know Vergne was discounting or waiving fees for use of the Powerhouse Community Center or other city facilities. He said he became aware of it as a result of the investigation.

“The council has a specific policy for charging fees and it was approved back in 2009,” he said. “It speaks to who gets free use of the facility and under what conditions people get charged.

“He specifically violated what the rules were and it’s very clear that he did it for people he knew and he didn’t do it for other people,” Huth added. “I can’t have employees charging people and the public … whatever they want.”

Ashley Jones, administrative services director, said permit fees for memorials are the same as all other events. They range from $350 to $550 an hour depending on the time of year and the residency of the person renting the facility.

Huth said Vergne believed “he had carte blanche to charge whatever he wanted during his tenure of being a department head.”

“I’m pretty sure that no manager would have ever given any employee that authority,” Huth said. “I don’t have that authority. … If I use that premise, then he didn’t have to charge anything for anybody to use the facility. And that’s just not acceptable.

“I believe the statement when he tells me he’s being doing it for a long time,” he added. “That could mean that instead of $150,000 we could be looking at a half a million dollars or even more over the years. We only went back two years. … That’s even more troublesome.”

Vergne said during the investigation he was shown three or four receipts for questionable charges made by Rogers on the city credit card. He said they were for department-related items such as surfboards, surfboard repairs and bathing suits for female lifeguards.

He said he wasn’t told the credit card charges amounted to thousands of dollars until Aug. 23.

Huth said some of the charges appear to be legitimate. Others, such as a $1,000 bicycle that is not the type used by the city and swimwear purchased from a vendor not normally used, do not.

Vergne’s attorney, Del Mar resident Dan Crabtree, said an outside contractor was hired to polish the Powerhouse floor because the city doesn’t own the proper equipment. A part-time city employee also worked for that company.

“What we found was, using him was cheaper for us than hiring an additional company,” Vergne said. “But to the best of my knowledge he wasn’t being paid twice.”

City Attorney Leslie Devaney disagrees.

“There is a way to hire people and to pay people,” she said. “To go outside that process was problematic and then to pay them more than they’re entitled to is a misuse of the public’s funds. This was a double-dipping sort of situation and the evidence was uncovered that it looks like that was known.”

Vergne admits he could have been “a little bit more diligent” in authorizing Rogers’ overtime.

“She worked events on occasion. She worked from home on occasion,” he said. “It came up that she wasn’t allowed to do that in her job description. I didn’t realize the scope. That’s where I definitely could have done a better job.”

Rogers was placed on paid administrative leave in early April after two Community Service Department employees filed complaints with the city.

Vergne was placed on paid leave two days later after being accused of attempting to interfere with the investigation. He disagrees with that conclusion.

He said he emailed Rogers to tell her to return anything that belonged to the city.

“I cc’d the city manager on that and that’s when I was put on leave,” he said. “The only other time that could be construed – and it wasn’t – is these people are my family, my friends. I have been at that tower for 28 years, just about every day. I was simply visiting to say hi. But there was no intent to interfere with anything.”

An outside investigator interviewed 20 employees and reviewed thousands of pages of records, according to the city, and filed a final report July 17.

A few days earlier Vergne filed a complaint against Huth for alleged harassment and retaliatory behavior. Another outside investigator concluded the claims had no merit.

Because managers such as Vergne are at-will employees, they don’t have a job right, which means they can be fired immediately.

After reading the report, Huth made that recommendation to City Council members, who unanimously supported the decision during a closed-session meeting Aug. 22.

The city also initiated the process to terminate Rogers and the part-time employee.

“From a professional standpoint and knowing what my responsibility is to the city and looking at the totality of the information that we got from the investigator and the actions of the employees during the investigation, it was easy to come to what was the right conclusion of what to do with them,” Huth said.

“But it was a very difficult decision, knowing in Pat’s case, how much good he’s done in the community,” he added. “I get that people like Pat. They appreciate his service to the community. I do, too. … He has a great legacy of helping people out … and doing really good things. And I’m not looking to tarnish that.

“But in the area of management and oversight, he made some significant mistakes that as an organization were very damaging to us,” Huth said. “I wish the best for Pat. I think he has a lot to be proud of. Unfortunately he made some very bad decisions.”

“I’m disappointed that there was this kind of misconduct,” Mayor Terry Sinnott said. “I’m disappointed because the employees have contributed to our community in very positive ways. But this type of activity has to be dealt with. We’re just sad that we had to go through this. But it was necessary.”

He and Huth said the city is taking steps to “correct the problems in the Community Services Department” and “ensure the problems identified in the report don’t happen again.”

Residents will not likely be happy with the outcome. More than 300 people signed an online petition demanding Vergne be reinstated earlier this summer.

Former County Supervisor Pam Slater-Price, a longtime Del Mar resident, called the issue “a failure of management.”

“It was a failure of proper management on the part of Scott Huth,” she said. “Then Huth blamed it on Pat and spent five-plus months investigating and trumping up charges. The charges are overstated and the whole story can now come out.”

Laura DeMarco described Vergne as “part of the fabric of Del Mar.”

“He and the lifeguards have protected us, our kids and millions of visitors to our beaches over the last 35 years,” she said. “They have the best safety record in the county, which is one of the major reasons why our beaches are so popular.”

Evidence collected during the investigation has been turned over to the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department for further review.

“It involved a misuse of public funds and we have an obligation to send it to the Sheriff’s Department instead of handling it internally,” Devaney said. “They’ll make a determination to move forward and include the (district attorney). That’s their decision.

“But when you uncover something internally of that magnitude, there’s an obligation to turn it over because it’s the public’s money,” she added.

Vergne said he preferred not to comment on whether he will pursue legal action against the city.

Other than helping his mother after the recent passing of his father, he said he has no immediate plans.

“But you’ll definitely see me walking around Del Mar and Solana Beach, getting exercise and talking to people to say hi,” he said.

 

 

 

1 Comment

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

a
or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?