O’side limits speaking times for council

OCEANSIDE — City Council voted to limit council member comments to 10 minutes per item, and to do away with council reports on Wednesday.

The rule to limit council members’ speaking time seemed to be directed at Councilwoman Esther Sanchez, who is known to speak at length and is the sole woman on the council.

Prior to council discussion several residents opposed the time limit, voicing their support for Sanchez, and said she informs them about the city history behind items.

“Some issues require extensive comments and background information,” Oceanside resident Jimmy Knott said.

Knott added it is a scientific fact that women need to talk longer than men.

No residents spoke in favor of the time limit.

Mayor Jim Wood recommended the speaking limit.

He said he has received complaints from residents about the two to three minute time limit for public speakers, and no limit for council members.

Wood and fellow council members said other meeting bodies have time limits of three to five minutes for representatives in order to keep discussions on schedule.

The council majority agreed 10 minutes is sufficient time to speak about most items, and more time can be requested.

Sanchez voted against the time restriction, and for discontinuing council reports.

She said putting limits on discussions reduces government transparency.

“It’s a violation of our commitment to the community for transparency, residents need to know why we say yes and why we say no,” Sanchez said.

Councilman Jerry Kern said council dialogue would continue to be transparent and open going forward.

During discussions Wood and Sanchez got into a public squabble when Sanchez said Wood made the recommendation in order for him to “get home sooner.”

Wood immediately replied, “I don’t want to sit here all night listening to you.”

Later, Wood said council meetings, which are scheduled to end by 9 p.m., run out of time to discuss items and time management needs to be addressed.

Fellow council members suggested that community recognitions and staff reports could also be briefer.

Council members were initially split on whether to discontinue council reports.

Others said council commission liaison information is shared, and reports should continue.

The council majority agreed to discontinue the reports, with the knowledge that council members could make a request to                   share information.

2 Comments
  1. bill 3 months ago

    unfortunately, we can never silence the thunderous cash bribe money that is always ROARING in the ears of corrupt bulldozer jim wood and crooked , mean-spirited jerry kern! IN OUR BEAZER-HOMES’ COMPANYTOWN, the developer’s lobbyist’s benjamin franklins never stop shouting to our reprobate RINOS!

  2. Itzamm 3 months ago

    The public is limited to 3 minutes during public agenda items. 10 minutes per Council member for each agenda item is more than sufficient to make their point. Like the public, they can view the agenda, prepare their remarks in advance to fit in the allotted 10 minutes, or request additional time if needed. Often, one Councilperson talks for 30 minutes or more for every item on the agenda, leaving little time for the others (and the public) to comment.
    And to “Bill,” it was the Diocese who sold the land at Academy and Mission to a developer, not the Mayor or Council. Anyone could have protested in the years of Planning meetings, rejection of other projects (like a Costco instead of residential homes) instead of grand-standing after the fact.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?