Early sightings of campaign signs stirring up confusion

Early sightings of campaign signs stirring up confusion
An Encinitas City Council candidate's campaign sign is causing some confusion over city's sign policy. Photo by Tony Cagala

ENCINITAS — Have you seen political campaign signs at some homes throughout Encinitas already, and wondered if isn’t it a bit early for the signs to be posted?

It is earlier than years past, but it’s legal, city officials said.

A new city policy that the council adopted in March allows for property owners to post up to two campaign signs on their property at any time, a major shift from the former policy which restricted campaign signs to a 33-day window — 3o days prior to and three days following an election.

City officials clarified this recent change to its interpretation of the city’s sign ordinance in a “frequently asked questions” sheet it released Wednesday afternoon. The city’s action was prompted by number complaints about the seemingly premature appearance of signs promoting Catherine Blakespear’s campaign at more than a dozen homes.

The FAQ sheet asks “what campaign signs can I post outside the 30 day period?” The answer: “On residential property, with the property owner’s permission, temporary signs (campaign or otehr noncommercial message) are allowed subject to certain limitations.” The city then gives the restrictions, which limit the height, number and duration the signs can be posted, six months.

The change occcurred with little fanfare at a March 19 city council meeting, when the Council amended its political sign ordinance to allow other so-called “noncommercial” message signs to be erected during the election season. The amendment was supposed to put the city’s code in line with case law to allow all signs — as long as they weren’t signs for commercial purposes such as for real estate or to promote sales — to be allowed during election season.

Earlier this week, however, at least one council member said the decision in March went further than that.

Lisa Shaffer said it changed the way the city interpreted other portions of its code dealing with signs, including one that allows for the message of a sign to be changed without city approval, and another that allows temporary signs to be erected on residential properties for six months.

“Until this point, we had different sections of the code to deal with different types of signs, but we were told that the city can’t restrict the content of the signs,” said Councilwoman Lisa Shaffer, who addressed her point of view on the topic in her weekly newsletter.

“It hasn’t been interpreted that way until we got the interpretation at that council meeting,” she added. “Our understanding until that meeting, whether implicit or explicit, was that political signs were regulated by that portion of the code, but we were told that actually, it was regulated by the other provisions as well.”

Shaffer said she discussed the change in her newsletter partly to head off a redux of the 2012 campaign sign controversy involving former Mayor Jerome Stocks and current Councilman Mark Muir that some dubbed “Signgate.”

The city determined that Muir’s and Stocks’ signs went up before they legally should have, after the duo were caught on video prematurely putting up signs. Three other candidates also had signs up too early, but none of the five candidates received any punishment.

“I am not advocating people put up signs now,” Shaffer said. “I am just telling them about the change.”

Some critics are concerned the change will lead to the proliferation of the signs – which some see as a nuisance — well in advance of elections.

Pam Slater-Price, a former county supervisor and Encinitas councilwoman was one of the people who contacted The Coast News about Blakespear’s signs.

She said she doesn’t understand why the city would deviate from its previous restrictions, which mirrors other cities across the county that limits the duration when campaign signs can be erected.

“I’ve been in government for 24 years, and I am sitting here saying, ‘What am I reading here,’ I couldn’t understand it, something is really confusing here,” Slater-Price said. “But my question is really, why? Why are you attempting to fix something that wasn’t broken?”

While some cities, like Chula Vista, San Marcos, Escondido, Carlsbad and Vista, do restrict the time campaign signs can be erected, some cities mirror Encinitas’ new measures.

Santee, for example, does not have any restrictions on when homeowners can erect signs and allows them to put up three such signs. Both of Encinitas’ coastal neighbors Solana Beach and Del Mar, as well as Coronado, also allow homeowners to put up signs at any time.

San Marcos also has similar sign regulations to Encinitas’.

 

This post has been updated to reflect the city’s position on campaign signs.

 

4 Comments
  1. Todd Hutcheson 12 months ago

    Campaign Signs are definitely free speech, but most municipalities still have a period when they may be put up legally. Hope the candidate wins this round.

  2. Fact Checker 12 months ago

    I’m curious why Pam Slater-Price would contact the Coast News about this, since she doesn’t even live in Encinitas and can’t vote in the City Council election.

  3. Fact Rechecker 12 months ago

    Pam Slater-Price has given more to Encinitas over the years than almost anyone else. She was involved in the formation of the city and was one of our most popular and effective mayors. She went on to become a highly regarded County Superintendent.

    Her name still means a lot in this town, and candidates for council seek her endorsement every election.
    She and others placed Encinitas on a great path with excellent governance. Bit by bit, the citizen protections that she and others put into place have changed for the worse.

    This political sign issue is not a welcome change. It will degrade our quality of life and take away from our enjoyment of where we live. She has a right to care because of the work she and other put in, we all enjoy many benefits of thoughtful decisions that happened during incorporation.

  4. Encinitas4real 12 months ago

    Maybe fact checker should question why Michael Andreen is still stirring up trouble in Encinitas even though thankfully he now lives in Oceanside. And he’s always trying to trash Encinitas, not protect it from greedy out of town interests who want to overdevelopment it and take their cash and leave. Andreen I’d heavily involved with Gaspar and best buds with good ol Jerome Stocks.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

or

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Skip to toolbar